The bad advice

The bad adviceThe thirty-fourth president of the United States, Dwight D. Eisenhower, excellently stated, You do non cut by hitting people oer the head thats assault not attractorship. Although, in modern clocks this statement may seem quite logical, it is interesting to note that in todays human world in that location be still nations that are lead by spring hungry politicians who be establish no interest in the well being of the people that dwell in their impoverished nations. These dictators of import leadership tactic is simple they rule by injecting fear into the masses. The Prince, written by Machiavelli, explores the complicated world of leaders and in the end accrues to its main argument that says, it is much to a greater extent than safe to be feared than to be pick outd, when you have to choose between the two. (Machiavelli, The Prince) While in many cases this may be true, it shouldnt be overlooked that Machiavelli wrote this work hundreds of years ago and as Bob Dylan had so perfectly put it, The times they are a-changin. With modern advancements and the whole world trying to push itself in a new direction, Machiavellis ideas may without delay become out-dated and flawed. Machiavelli believes that if a leader is love too much, this allows for the people to have too much power which eventually ordain result in revolt. Nevertheless, in todays world where democracy in many nations is the norm, being loved by the people has more than benefits than being feared by analyzing recent history one will be able to prove that leadership with a more open mind is significantly split then leading people through fear.When referring to the word peace, a few instant semipolitical figures come to mind and one of these people is none other than Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Not only was Gandhi the political leader of his homegr protest nation India during the Independence Movement, but he was also regarded as the spiritual leader. His famous nonvi olence radiation patterns had godlike independence movements not only in India but in countries all over the world. Gandhi is hailed to be nonplus of India and his leading practices did not involve any form of force or violence. Instead of using his fist, Gandhi would intake his calm personality and persuasive public speaking techniques in order to win over the black Maria of the people and lead a nation that was on the course of total destruction to salvation. Machiavelli urged that a leader should have some sort of physical control over the people, but little did he hit the sack that hundreds of years later a man by the name of Gandhi would completely shatter the foundations of former leading principles. Gandhi, had famously stated, When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall- theorize of it, always. This inspirational quote proves that societies created by tyrants will eventually crumble and democracy and peace will invariably prosper. In addition, Gandhi was not the first person to introduce the theory of non-violence but he was the first to practice it on such a large scale. By advocating non-violence Gandhi directly contradicts Machiavellis beliefs through the following quoteThe wisdom of war leads one to dictatorship, pure and simple. The science of non-violence alone can lead one to pure democracyPower establish on love is thousand times more effective and permanent than power derived from fear of punishment.It is a blasphemy to say non-violence can be practiced only by individuals and never by nations which are composed of individuals.Gandhi message to the world is clear and simple love and peace are far stronger and more effective then fear. Although, Machiavelli wrote in a completely different time period it is clear how Gandhi negates his theories. (Http//www.mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org/b io_5000/bio5.htm.)If there was a man that was the complete anti- Christ of Gandhi that man would have been named Kim Jong-Il. Kim Jong-Il is the dictator of North Korea which was a res publica that was founded by his father in 1994. Although, his image inside the North Korean borders may be visualised as saintly, in reality it is the fear of the people he leads that actually give him his prestigious status. some(prenominal) North Koreans officially refer to him as Great Leader, but if they werent pressured by his tyrannical rule they would or so likely come up with different names for him some of which would not be as nice as the name he holds now. Due to his strong grasp and negative influence he holds over his people, his country will never be able to prosper like many powerful democracies some the world. If one were to take a look at some of the most powerful modern nations they would take up that all of them are held together by a strong democratic backbone. The only nati on in the modern era that seemed to prosper even though it was ruled by a dictator was the Soviet Union, but like Gandhi had predicted it eventually collapsed just like all the other tyrannies that came before it. Once again, Machiavellis advice seems to have many flaws if it were to be used in the modern world. Kim Jong-Il is tirelessly trying to create a more powerful nation but is failing to do so because of his corrupt leading techniques. (http//asianhistory.about.com/od/profilesofasianleaders/p/BioKimJongil.htm)Machiavelli had mentioned that a leader can either implement harsh rule or be loved by the people but most likely he cannot be both, however the former convention of China, Mao Zedong, may have disproved this theory. Mao Zedong was a Chinese revolutionary and at the same time communist leader. With any communist nation, harsh rule and strict policy is a given which makes it heavy for a communist leader to be popular with the people, but Mao Zedong somehow was able to b e adored by his followers. To this day Mao is regarded in China as an incredible revolutionary, political mastermind, legions genius and overall the savior of China. Many people give Mao credit for taking Chinas principally agricultural society and transforming it into the economic powerhouse that is today. Although, many people praise him for his revolutionary genius, Mao didnt give all his accomplishments through the love of the people. He was in fact still a dictator more interested in the prosperity of his nation rather than the prosperity of his people. Mao had implemented several political policies and purges which were now estimated to have caused the deaths of roughly sixty million people. Nevertheless, most Chinese people still hailed them as their hero because without him China would have ended up much worse without him. Mao again illustrates how Machiavellis advice does not apply to the modern world. (http//www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/)Many different leaders have their own leading styles, but what most modern and successful leaders have in common is that they lead democratic countries where the voice of the people is heard. Of course, there will always be exceptions to the norm such as Mao Zedong, but even he doesnt follow Machiavellis advice. All three figures presented in the earlier paragraphs disprove the idea that Machiavelli created years ago.Works CitedMachiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince. Hertfordshire Wordsworth Editions, 1997.Http//www.mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org/bio_5000/bio5.htm. MAHATMA GANDHI ONE SPOT COMPLETE INFORMATION WEBSITE. Web. 24 Feb. 2010. .Kim Jong il autobiography North Korea. Asian History History of Asia. Web. 23 Feb. 2010. .Reference Archive Mao Zedong. Marxists Internet Archive. Web. 24 Feb. 2010. .